首页> 外文OA文献 >Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews
【2h】

Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews

机译:含糖饮料与体重增加之间的关联的财务利益冲突和报告偏见:系统评价的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Industry sponsors’ financial interests might bias the conclusions of scientific research. We examined whetherfinancial industry funding or the disclosure of potential conflicts of interest influenced the results of published systematicreviews (SRs) conducted in the field of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and weight gain or obesity.Methods and Findings: We conducted a search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases to identifypublished SRs from the inception of the databases to August 31, 2013, on the association between SSB consumption andweight gain or obesity. SR conclusions were independently classified by two researchers into two groups: those that founda positive association and those that did not. These two reviewers were blinded with respect to the stated source of fundingand the disclosure of conflicts of interest. We identified 17 SRs (with 18 conclusions). In six of the SRs a financial conflict ofinterest with some food industry was disclosed. Among those reviews without any reported conflict of interest, 83.3% of theconclusions (10/12) were that SSB consumption could be a potential risk factor for weight gain. In contrast, the samepercentage of conclusions, 83.3% (5/6), of those SRs disclosing some financial conflict of interest with the food industrywere that the scientific evidence was insufficient to support a positive association between SSB consumption and weightgain or obesity. Those reviews with conflicts of interest were five times more likely to present a conclusion of no positiveassociation than those without them (relative risk: 5.0, 95% CI: 1.3–19.3). An important limitation of this study is theimpossibility of ruling out the existence of publication bias among those studies not declaring any conflict of interest.However, the best large randomized trials also support a direct association between SSB consumption and weight gain orobesity.Conclusions: Financial conflicts of interest may bias conclusions from SRs on SSB consumption and weight gain or obesity.
机译:背景:行业赞助商的经济利益可能会使科学研究的结论产生偏差。我们研究了金融行业的资金投入或潜在利益冲突的披露是否影响了在含糖饮料(SSB)和体重增加或肥胖症领域进行的已发表系统评价(SR)的结果。通过PubMed,Cochrane图书馆和Scopus数据库来确定从数据库开始到2013年8月31日的有关SSB摄入量与体重增加或肥胖之间关系的已发布SR。 SR结论由两名研究人员独立地分为两类:建立正关联的结论和未建立正关联的结论。这两位审稿人对既定的资金来源和利益冲突的披露视而不见。我们确定了17个SR(有18个结论)。在其中的六个SR中,披露了与某些食品行业的财务利益冲突。在那些没有任何利益冲突报道的评价中,有83.3%(10/12)的结论是食用SSB可能是体重增加的潜在危险因素。相比之下,在那些与食品行业发生某些财务利益冲突的SR中,有83.3%(5/6)的结论的百分比相同,即科学证据不足以支持SSB消费与体重增加或肥胖之间的正相关。那些有利益冲突的评论得出没有正向联想的结论的可能性是没有利益冲突的那些评论的五倍(相对风险:5.0,95%CI:1.3-19.3)。这项研究的一个重要局限性是不可能排除那些没有宣布任何利益冲突的研究中存在出版偏倚,但是,最佳的大型随机试验也支持SSB摄入量与体重增加肥胖症之间的直接关联。感兴趣的研究可能会使SR得出的关于SSB摄入量,体重增加或肥胖的结论存在偏差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号